Friday, August 28, 2009

What if...

....Josh and I had dated when we could have looked this good?!?


1964


1968


1976


1982


1990

If only.

At least I can rest assured that my husband is good-lookin' with any hairstyle. ;-)

I originally posted these photos way back in September '08, but due to my immediate need for a smile I'm putting them up again today. If you're interested, go to Yearbook Yourself to take a step or two back in time!





13 comments:

  1. hey, now wait a minute...that "1990's" one looks WAY too much like me in the 80's! not that i want to look older or anything. i think the 2nd look is my favorite! ☺

    ReplyDelete
  2. way to keep yourself busy, rach!!!

    i love that darn website. i could waste the rest of the day away... hmmmmm....

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm loving 1968 for both of you! :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I played around with this, too, many months ago. Isn't it funny how time changes perspectives. I was in Target last night looking at some clothing that looked as though it came right out of my 70s teenage wardrobe. I could hardly stand to look at it. I won't say there's nothing new under the sun, but there's not much!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey - you look cute in those eyeglasses from '64! Great way to keep on smiling girl!!!

    The phone has to ring today though - right?!

    ReplyDelete
  6. he looked best in the '76 hair style! ha! these are so fun!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh HILARIOUS!
    I can honestly say I will NEVER understand what we were thinking when we had those wall bangs!

    ReplyDelete
  8. You two were smokin' hot in 1968.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sorry I haven't been able to post..but one of the only reasons I log on is to see if you got your travel call. Praying and hoping it comes very soon. This is way too long to have to wait.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wait, Josh dated your MOM in 1990????

    ReplyDelete
  11. FUNNY - It was great to see you both tonight - check out my daily grace and mercy blog when you get a minute.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Love it! 1964 did not even look like you at first! Cracks me up! :)

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails